Erratic Reports

RE: “Iraq Announces It Will Reinstate 20,000 Hussein-Era Army Officers

To the Editor:

This article was so erratic that it was hard to pay attention to. It begins by talking about the reinstated army officers, moves to a discussion about the elections, and ends with discussion of Christians being murdered in Mosul. None of these things are tied together in the end and the reader is just left wondering what the heck they just read. Reinstating 20,000 army officers that supported Hussein seems like something that Americans would be or should be interested in, but instead we are given the run-around because perhaps we wouldn’t understand the motives for such a move, but one thing we do understand is the murder of those like the majority of Americans, Christian. Why do most people read the newspaper? To find out things that we do not already know, so why pretend it is anything less than that. Give us full and complete reports that are not peppered with other irrelevant information.

Rambling a New Kind of Journalism

RE: “Errant Rocket Kills Civilians in Afghanistan” February 15, 2010

To the Editor:

It is surprising to me the amount of unnecessary fluff was in this article. The deaths of at least 15 people are not something to be swept under the rug or watered down with unnecessary commentary. The fact that a military weapon that is “advertised as being accurate enough to strike within a yard of their intended targets” then there is absolutely no reason that the wrong building was hit. The wrong building that was “a few hundred yards away”. A few HUNDRED is unacceptable when lives are at risk. By allowing the authors of this article to ramble on for four more unnecessary columns is just ridiculous and takes away from the true issue at hand.

The Only Fight

Re: “Housing Offer in Jerusalem has Palestinians Crying Foul” (news article Feb 26)

To the Editor

Throughout history and across cultures people have always fought hardest for their land and all that they define as “home.” In Jerusalem there seems to be a pattern of forcing people out of their homes and relocating them. Doing this once is enough to breed such resentment as to make future relations nearly intolerable. To do this twice may build such a storm of resentment as to topple the state, never underestimate a hounded people. The mayor’s plan to build up a tourist district in a residential area upsets many people. Though the Palestinian’s are not in power, they are great in number and I ask it is truly wise to keep pushing these people, eventually you will cross a point and they will be pushed no further. Both sides, the Israelites and the Palestinians are fearful of losing their home and so both are willing to fight their fiercest to win. However, it is interesting how many crimes were committed against the Israelites through history and now they angrily call the same atrocities down upon the heads of their Palestinian neighbors.

Estelle S.
Denver, Feb 26, 2010

History or Home

RE: Mayor’s Housing Offer Sets Off Row in Jerusalem (February 26th 2010)

To the Editor:

When reading this article written by, Ethan Bronner, he describes the current mayor's predicament of what do with the illegal settlements in Al Bustan. The author describes the past conflict between Israelis and Palestinians and how it is still a current event, long lines of mistrust between these two people. The mayor wants to tear down the current houses of Palestinians and rebuild apartments above shops, add parks and boost the tourist economy that visit the city every year. While the mayor says he is trying to be a man of all the people on both sides and all incomes, others are wary to believe in him and his project. Some people who would have to give up their houses are trying not to focus on the history of mistrust, but that the mayor can go home and not worry about someone wanting to tear down his home. While they have that worry every night, so which will they choose? History or Home? This article reminded me of the movie Occupied Minds where we saw the current dispute between Palestinians and Israelis. Even though people in the movie were trying to state how they were accepting of the other side, there were still feelings of an uncomfortable history between them. This is just another view at the level of mistrust still happening in the city.

History of the Patriarchs

re: Unrest Persists Over Israel Plan for Cave of the Patriarchs (2/26/10)

To the Editor:
Even as the United States is pressuring Israel and Palestine to enter peace talks the Israeli government has added the Cave of Patriarchs to a list of Jewish Holy Sites. The Cave of Patriarchs is located deep in the heart of Palestinian territory, and the Palestinians are deeply upset. From watching the documetery in class and reading Knight's book I have learned that different religions may share the same holy sites, and that respecting different religions can get one much further than judgement. Both religions recognize the Cave as the burial site of Abraham (a main figure in both religions). From what I have learned about the Islamic view of Abraham and what I know of the Jewish perception of the man, he would not want blood to be shed over which religion had control over his grace, nor would he want to see peace talks stalled or done away with because of a holy site.

Mi Casa no es Su Casa

RE: "Mayor's Housing Offer Sets Off Row in Jerusalem" (25 February 2010)

The conflicts between Israel and Palestine are not by any means new. Everything within the state is affected by this ethnic division. Housing is no exception. The article discussed Mayor Nir Barkat's new plan to demolish a Palestinian neighborhood and rebuild it up as a high-class residency. The current residents worry that they are being kicked out to make way for Jewish families to take over. As the article mentioned, this clearly exemplifies the tensions and mistrust both groups have towards each other. However, I do not think this is a religious debate. Rather, it is a political debate under the tensions of religious differences. It is because religion is the most prominent division that it gets most of the blame, and neither side is willing to see how events affect others. This ignorance has dragged the problem on for centuries and it is time to end. Perhaps Barkat's plan will fail and the situation worsens, or perhaps it will actually succeed and relations will improve. But who can say until it is done?

Kellye T.
26 February 2010
Greeley, Colo.

A "Model" of Harmony

Re: A Model of Harmony Is Found in a Flashpoint City for Iraqi Sectarian Fighting (Monday, February 22nd, 2010)

To the Editor:
In Monday’s New York Times subscription, the article “A Model of Harmony is Found in a Flashpoint City for Iraqi Sectarian Fighting” speaks to the relative quiet between Sunni and Shi’ite groups in Samarra, an important pilgrimage town in Iraq, and the looming knowledge that America will be leaving the city of in order to provide independence to the city soon. I find that the title of the article isn’t fitting, with the term “Model of Harmony” being utilized. The division between the Sunni and Shi’ite divisions of Islam has existed since the late 7th century, and a great deal of fighting and bloodshed has occurred between these divisions since. What’s most important to note is that this harmony is promoted not through discussion, but by “by a long stretch of gray blast wall separating the shrine and its pilgrims from the rest of the city.” While it’s good that violence has been stemmed, I can only help but feel this is a temporary solution. The United States’ recommendation that the fighting be resolved by building a more technologically sound wall is not going to provide stability between these two groups. I’m reminded of the Berlin Wall and its attempt to resolve disputes between two groups with clashing ideals, and I can only help but feel this resolution will change nothing in Iraq.

Another Puzzle in Iran After Nuclear Fuel Is Moved

To the Editor,

In the Article, "Another Puzzle in Iran After nuclear Fuel Is Moved" there is a lot of information about the possible theories as to why Iran moved 4300 pounds of uranium out of underground storage into a storage unit above ground. Although there is a lot of information about the three different theories that experts have come up with there is mostly information about the possible theory that Iran is trying to provoke Israel to launch an attack against them, making the conflict worse than it already is. I feel like this is the least likely of the situations, but the article makes it seem like the most likely. First of all, if Iran wanted to create more of a conflict with Israel they could do it without putting their whole supply of fuel above ground as an easy target. Also, Iran knows that everyone is watching them and that everyone would speculate as soon as they moved their fuel. They wouldn't move it with a motivation that was that obvious to the rest of the world. They probably have a reason for moving it, but it is probably a reason that people wouldn't suspect.

The Ethics of Politics

Re: Iraq to Rehire 20,000 Hussein-Era Army Officers
2/25/10 by Marc Santora

To the Editor:

I am appalled to find out that Iraq has made this decision to re-hire Hussein's army men for the soul purpose of an election. This move, while it does not directly affect American citizens, will damage the Iraqi standing. A big part of the removal of these soldiers was their military tactics and brutal disciplinary style. I for see that upon their arrival the persecutions and brutality will begin anew. And all for what? To have some extra voters? This is an unacceptable reason for any government to reinstate machine killers. This move is disconcerting and nauseating and begs the question: What else will we do to get our way? Who else will we put in danger? And has this war become so primitive that the ethics are lost to the lust of victory?

Cutting Separation and Hair

RE: Barbershop Politics in Baghdad by Steven Lee Myers

To the Editor:

What struck me most about this article by Steven Lee Myers was not what his subjects had to say about politics, their topic of conversation, but rather the fact that in this barbershop, there sat men from different walks of life, different faiths, different beliefs, having a civil conversation about politics. “'We are brothers in this barbershop,' Sadiq al-Jaff, a barber [said.]" Myers found a small little barbershop in Baghdad where Kurds and Shiites live and work together, serving Kurds, Sunnis, Shiites, and Americans alike, with no prejudice for any, but equal respect for all. Myers refers to this place as " a little ecumenical oasis in the bustling heart of Baghdad." From what I have come to understand of Islam, this little barbershop is the perfect example of what Islam is supposed to be: peaceful, gentle, and calm. Not only this, but a faith that welcomes and accepts all people. Myers comments on the "postcard of a Christian altar and another of Imam Hussein, the revered Shiite martyr and grandson of the Prophet Muhammad"hanging on the walls, clearly showing this invitation to all people, theologies, and beliefs. It's funny how and where people can come together. After reading Knight's book, I feel like he would be an advocate for a small barbershop like this, a place where people could meet, discuss tough issues, and part friends, despite clashing ideologies or difference of opinions.

The "Impossible" Is Possible

RE: A Model of Harmony Is Found in a Flashpoint City for Iraqi Sectarian Fighting (February 23, 2010)
To the editor:
All we often hear in the media are the bad issues coming out of the middle east, but I found one article in Tuesday's paper particularly enlightening. The article talks about Samarra, a city in Iraq once filled with violence and it's dramatic change to now being a peaceful area. This gives me hope that there are good things coming out of this war and it is possible to achieve what many say is impossible. The only question is: can this continue? Is it possible that this area can remain peaceful without American assistance? Their Prime Minister says that their security forces will be able to keep the violence out even after the U.S. withdrawals. They are doing this now without actual military assistance from us, however; they continue to use the U.S. as a "guide" as to what they do. Samarra's forces do almost nothing without advice from the American military. Which, is fine because we are there to help them, but eventually they are going to need to live on their own. We can use this situation as an example as to what will happen to the rest of the middle east that has U.S. forces in it now. When America leaves the Middle East, unfortunatly, there will continue to be massive amounts of violence becuase they do not have our help, if we do not start making them do it themselves now.

Consistency will bring Peace

Re: Afghan Officials Claim Control Over Taliban Area (February 24, 2010)
To The Editor,
When the combined forces chased the Taliban out of Marja, the attitudes of the citizens of this former Taliban stronghold were depicted as ungrateful. However I think that one man interviewed in this article summed up the feelings of the villagers perfectly, He said, “For us, they [the militaries] are not useful. We don’t want them to stay in Marja. We want them to leave. For us both the Taliban and the Marines are the same. They are fighting and killing us. We don’t want either.” How can anyone blame them for this attitude though? For years these people have lived in fear of everything. In their eyes this takeover is not one of peace but merely one group with guns being replaced by another. However I think that a situation like Marja is exactly what this war needs. Everyone, not just the people of Marja, need to see that once a promise is made it will be kept. The Afghan army needs to keep its promise of building schools and clearing the city of anything that could harm the inhabitants. Once the inhabitants see that the Taliban is not their only option for consistent security I believe that the support needed for the troops will be readily given and this war will be able to do what needs to be done to restore peace and security everywhere.

No Sweet in Violence

Re: “Violent Attacks in Iraq Leave at Least 23 Dead, Including 9 Children” (February 23, 2010)

To the Editor:

In Marc Santora’s article about the random killings around Iraq, little information is given about with whom the gunmen were connected. These seem to be random because “Authorities detected no discernible pattern to the violence…” Emotion is a key in this article. The title describes the number of children included in the death toll. Santora also describes that many of the victims were beheaded. Finally, there is disconnected emotion from the gunmen as we cannot see their eyes in the picture above the article. Therefore, we cannot see their complete outward identity. An interesting part of the article is some of the words that the author uses. He uses the word reminiscent which is often used as a word to think of sweet memories of long ago, such as to reminisce about an old romance. However, there is nothing sweet about what the author is describing. The conflicts during the “…bloodletting between Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq…” is not a distant memory. The author himself describes that it happened only a few years ago. The true emotions invoked by Santora are the fact that there is no end in sight for the Iraqis…yet.

Mosque or Bomb Headquarters?

To the Editor:

In Friday's New York Times, a short article entitled, "At Least 30 Die in Blast At a Mosque in Pakistan," starts out by explaining the facts of where, when, how many dead and injured, but soon reveals the twist: the mosque was not only being used for worship, but as a militant base for the Lashkar-e-Islam, a militant group. The explosion's cause is undefined as of now, but the options are as follows: a suicide vest accidentally exploded (which was assembled in the mosque), or an attack from the Lashkar-e-Islam (a rival militant group). Whichever was the cause for this tragedy, I believe it is a relevant question to ask, "Why is a mosque (a place for Islam worship) being used to build suicide vests and bombs, and how does this worship and honor their God?"

A Top Terrorism Prosecutor Is a Critic of Civilian Trials(February 19)

To the editor,

In the article "A Top Terrorism Prosecutor Is a Critic of Civilian Trials" the author discusses McCarthy's change in position on the war vs. crime terrorism issue. He was a top prosecutor in convicting terrorists of a crime and now he has switched views and said "a war is a war, not a crime, and you don't bring your enemies into a courthouse." I feel like this article focused more on McCarthy and his political standings. Some issues were brought up between the pros and the cons of war vs. crime but the article should have focused more on the issues and what McCarthy had to say instead of focusing on what others had to say about McCarthy. The problem we face is something that all people should be educated on. The point that terrorists are people we are fighting, and not American Citizens should be reiterated. We do not owe terrorists the right to a trial, or any rights at all for that matter. It is more important to educate people on that matter than on the change of view people have towards McCarthy.

Long term vs. short term and the world's view of the U.S.

Re: “Marines Join in Sorrow After Afghan Casualties” (news article Feb 17)

To the Editor:

Where war walks, death dances. People on all sides of a conflict will die, in C.J. Chivers article about the civilian deaths in Marja Afghan where some 12 people lost their lives due to one or two 675 pound rockets. The comments made by the Afghan interior minister Muhammad Hanif Atmar are what move me to write. He and other community leaders in the area though saddened by the deaths are able to see the bigger picture with respect to the control of the Taliban. Atmar understood that they died for the freedom of their country and that the Taliban are responsible for the endangerment of these people by picking sniper posts among them. I am grateful that the leaders are not blaming the U.S. for the deaths but I am concerned for the individuals in the community itself. If so many little events occur, of a similar nature, the people of Afghanistan will have more of a melancholy thought of us. We might become in their eyes an unnecessary evil and the tide might turn. At the same time no matter how the people may view us, as we are already doing it, it is important to continue opposing the Taliban and being intolerant of their indiscriminant killing.

Estelle S.
Denver, Feb 19, 2010

Fight for the Right

RE: "Iranians Protest Bill On Rights Of Women" February 18, 2010

To the Editor:

This article carries an important message to women throughout the world, not just the Middle East. The notion that women are inferior to men is something that haf been fought for generations. The fact that women in Iran are reclaiming their rights has bearing on the entire population of women. Though women have been subjugated since the Islamic Revolution, they have begun to stand up for their rights again. The protesting of new legislation that further demeans women is very important indeed. One needs only to look at how dissenters are treated to know that this is a battle worth fighting for. That those that protest would choose to face such treatment speaks not only of their bravery, but also of the cowardice of those creating such unjust laws. I hope that through the actions of those fighting, other women in the world will see their own value.

Cheryl F.

Israel Combats Propaganda with Propaganda

Re: Positive Views of Israel, Brought to You by Israelis (Feb. 18, 2010).

To the Editor:

In the February 18th article "Positive Views of Israel, Brought to You by Israelis," the author discusses the Israeli government’s attempt after an allegedly successful (but flawed, in that the killers were detected) assassination of a Hamas leader one month before to begin a reimaging of Israelis throughout the world. The author indicates that the main message is to try to rebrand Israel– “a government effort to improve a nation’s international image.” Little information is provided by the author regarding the exact method that Israelis using in its rebranding, and I am not positive that this is going to be the most effective manner of combating stereotypes. The Arab nations and Israel have been at odds with one another since long before this Hamas incident, and many Arab states have been spending a great deal of money in portraying a bad image of Israel. The main groups that these messages are aimed at, therefore, are Arab individuals who are already at ends with Israel. Attempting to combat propaganda with opposed propaganda is going to strengthen those core groups who wish to hear this rebranding, but its effect may not penetrate outside of this core group. Explicitly instructing Israeli citizens to combat stereotypes with a script may not provide much credence in this endeavor.

Know Thy Enemy

"Iran Suicide Bomber Strikes in Anbar"
Published Feb. 18, 2010
Steven Lee Myers

To the Editor:

As I dove into the article regarding the recent suicide bombing in Iran I noticed a few things. Firstly, I would like to point out and commend the New York Times for being quite honest and blunt in regards to these picky issues. I find that many newspaper companies or individual articles try to conceal the real facts behind a sugar coating of "everything is just peachy-keen" while the truth remains savagely bloody. I would like to thank the New York Times for their clarity on the facts.
All flattery aside, however, I would like to note my concern of a comment made by Kari Abdul Hadi, the aide to Anbar's Governor, in regard to the bombers themselves. "We are lost." he says, "We don't know our enemy." This statement is somewhat disconcerting especially considering the amount of Iraqi and American aid that is being sent to help Anbar. If the person we are supporting has no clue as to who his enemies are or how to deal with them, what is the purpose of our aid? Perhaps we have soft hearts and want to help someone in need. While I agree with this, I do think that it falls on the shoulders of Hadi himself to research and know his enemy in order to appropriately address them.

Democracy Over Militancy

Re: Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals, 19 February 2010

To the Editor:

Thom Shanker writes in his article of soldiers, instead of marching in to seize a town, entering into a province with the purpose of polling its residents to inquire as to what they would like to see from the soldiers fighting for their cause. I think that this is a brilliant idea. Following the documentary viewed in class several periods ago where natives to that area were discussing how they hate that other people are making decisions for them and thereby making the wrong decisions, I believe that this is a great act of democracy that the military is now putting into affect. Instead of barging in to blow the place up, American soldiers, partnered with President Hamid Karzai are teaming up to diplomatically request the opinions of those who are most impacted. I understand there is some level of militancy here, as pointed out in the article that obviously it's a challenge to do door to door polls in a hostile environment. However, the fact that "This is all a war of perceptions,” as General McChrystal said. “This is not a physical war in terms of how many people you kill or how much ground you capture, how many bridges you blow up. This is all in the minds of the participants.” I think that the warring sides are continuing to take steps in the right direction to give all countries involved what they want, especially America. So many people feel like a lot of the war has been caused because Americans desire to force their opinions and government style on everyone else in the world. Apparently, this is a step in a better direction.

A Historical Echo

RE: With Steel and Asphalt, Bridge Helps Seal Baghdad’s Division (Feb 18th, 2010).

To the Editor:

This article written by Anthony Shadid, describes a divided place in Baghdad which has been further defined by the implementation of a bridge. This new development will join two Shiite neighborhoods to ease the journey from Greihat to the sacred, gold-leafed shrine in Kadhimiya. In the past they had to trek through a very violent and dangerous path in Sunni territory. With the bridge the article states that travelers feel much safer going to their destination. But my issue with this is something they quote Winston Churchill in saying, “we shape our buildings and afterward our buildings shape us.” This bridge gives an echo into the Berlin wall and the divisions made during North and Main Ireland. I've been to Ireland and seen the walls that separated people based on religion. Even though the tensions in nearby cities to the main conflict in Ireland have come to a mutual agreement of peace, the different colored "British" sides and the "Irish side" sidewalks speak to the conflict still embedded in the country. I fear something like this bridge will further deepen the wound, and is only a temporary solution.

Who Dunnit?

RE: More Mystery Over Killing of an Official in Hamas (17 February 2010)

To the Editor:

Throughout the article published on 17 February 2010, there are very few instances that mentioned any sort of stance on the murder itself. Instead, the article focused primarily on the investigations about the passport frauds and the concerns of those U.K. citizens with the same names as those used on the frauds. I would think that assassinating a Hamas leader would take precedence and be the major concern for all involved. Because of the volatile atmosphere associated with the group, any actions would most definitely create reactions from the other side. The relationship between Israel and Dubai was mentioned in the article, but was very vague about what each side thinks about the events. Finding the people who committed the crimes is important, but I think creating diplomatic safety measures (such as appeasement) to make sure that there is no further retribution is also highly important.

Kellye T.
19 February 2010
Greeley, Colo.

Until Everyone is Free, No One is Free

Re: Iranians Protest Bill on Rights of Women (February 17, 2010)

To The Editor,
There are many preconcieved notions about Islam here in the U.S. One particular notion seems to be that Islam views women as inferior, however that is not necessarily true. The fact of the matter is that because of the flexible nature of Arabic many men have taken Qur'an verses and translated them in a way that best fits their needs. This shows that many times it is not Islam that is the oppressor but the authoritative male figures of Islam that are keeping women inferior to men. However as one can see by this article, many women are fed up with being oppressed and are rising up together to gain the rights that they deserve. This struggle is something that many western women should be able to relate to. Not too long ago American women did not have the right to vote and were therefore not deemed full citizens of the United States. It wasn't until 1920 that the 19th amendment was ratified, giving women the right to vote inthe U.S. This should show everyone that no matter how different someone may be, there is always something there that is shared, whether it be a quality or a struggle or a dream. When women from the tribal areas of Pakistan were asked what they want in life they replied that they didn't want their babies to die and that they wanted their children to recieve an education. This statment is something all women should be able to relate to. I believe that this article should remind everyone that no one can truly be free, until everyone is free and that in the end people are much more similar than they think.

A Step Forward

RE: Iraqi Women Are Seeking Greater Political Influence (2/16/10)
To the Editor:
I found the article about women’s rights in Iraqi politics by John Leland and Riyadh Mohammed to be enlightening and hopeful. Throughout much of his book, Michael Muhammad Knight laments the state of women’s rights in Islamic countries, discussing gender segregated mosques and even some holy places that women are not allowed to enter. So it is promising to see women starting to take a bigger role in the Iraqi government. However, even though the Iraqi Constitution requires that 25% of seats in parliament go to women, I would still like to see some serious measures taken to combat some of the injustices mentioned in the article, like women not being allowed into meetings or forced into soft leadership positions. Women, even women that have been hidden away for many years, still have a voice and deserve to have their voice heard in government. Iraqis have taken the first steps on the road to gender equality, but they still have many hurdles ahead of them.

Dejavu on Women's Rights

Re: Iranians Protest Bill On Rights Of Women (February 18, 2010)

To the Editor:
Nazila Fathi's article "Iranians Protest Bill..." suggest problems occuring in Iran that are similar to those experienced in the United States nearly thirty years ago. In Cathy Guisewhites comic strip, "Cathy", women's rights in America is a struggle. In her earliest five or ten comics, Guisewhite's character is timid. As she gets more developed as a cartoon, her becomes strong and even attends some Women's rights meetings. Michael Muhammad Knight descrbes women's rights in his book, Journey to the End of Islam (2009) where there are certain mosques that Knight is allowed to attend that his girlfriend is not allowed to attend. The strangest part of this is that these are American mosques. Meaning, the issues of Women's rights in the United States is not over. Unequal pay for women in positions of equal status and skill is another example. The need for women to become masculine in order to achieve positions of leadership as opposed to preserving their femininity is another example. Therefore, the issues that are going on in Iran are just a harsher reality of what is still an unfortunate problem in the United States.

Dishonesty, Corruption and Scandals: Never Completly Gone

RE: Palestinian President Suspends Top Aide in Sex Scandal (Monday Feb. 15, 2010)

To the editor:
Here in the United States, we too have experienced corruption within our authority and it is usually brought to our attention by one person with hidden secrets. We may think some of the scandals that come out of our government our bad, but when we take a look at other countries "cover ups" ours don't look all that bad. For example, in February 15th's New York Times there was an article regarding a sex scandal and Palestine's chief of staff to their president. This whole situation surfaced when a former Palestinian intelligence official, Fahmi Shabaneh, said he was frustrated with the intense corruption within their government. Of course, Mr. Husseini is blaming Israel for doctoring the sex tape and it's said that Mr. Shabaneh is basically score-settling from a previous dispute with the chief of staff. The beginning of this article first had me thinking mostly of the corruption with the sex scandal, however towards the end I began to realize the corruption goes much further into their government. The members of their government are going out of their way to personally do harm on each other. Mr. Shabaneh went out of his way to set up a hidden video camera and record the chief of staff in a very personal situation and probably because he was just trying to get back at the Husseini for pressing charges on him in Israel. The point is, there is so much corruption within their authoritative people, that even the people claiming and trying to stop the corruption are only doing it as a way to to settle past corruption allegations on themselves. It seems that no one is trustworthy in this situation and to be fixed, it's going to require major government changes.

What ever you want

RE:  "Article title" (date published)

To the Editor:

My LTE.......

"Baghdad is Red, Clerics Are Blue: Valentine's Back, Roses For You"

To the Editor:

Your Valentine's Day article about the celebrations in Baghdad was initially to be honest kind of eerie. The way the media portrays Arabic nations in contrast to the way the day's celebrations are described brings to mind an echo of a holiday we celebrate in the U.S.A. What the article neglected to mention was the fact that St. Valentine's Day is a very western holiday. Its origins were from Saint Valentine of Rome, and his namesake holiday is a very Christian holiday in origin. This represents a adopted Western influence on the people and culture of Baghdad, however not one that seems to be resented by the native people. They have very much taken this Christian holiday and run with it, wearing red and buying flowers for their loved ones. This represents an adaptation to Westernization that is not met with a violent clash so often portrayed by the media. This is a Baghdad that Americans can relate to and one that should be given some more thought, and perhaps analysis so that commonalities are found, and compromises are brought to light to give American and Baghdad citizens a more realistic view from the media of all of the accepted lasting influences present in the clash of these two cultures.

LTE 4: Democracy for Democratizing

To the Editor:
In a recent article by Mark Landler, “Iran Policy Now More in Sync With Clinton’s Views,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is struggling to calm the conflict in Iran. However, what she needs to ask Iran for us is: What does Iran need and want? In Michael Muhammad Knight’s book, Journey to the End of Islam, Knight refers to a Pakistani man who believed that the only way Pakistan would survive is if the Americans took control of it. The question to ask is if this is what the Iranians want. In 2003, we forgot to ask Iraq this question. We blamed Iraq for having nuclear weapons. We ended up being wrong. Now, we are finding ourselves in a similar situation and we need to do something different. The finger pointing will no longer work. Though there are summits, and discussions, even negotiations, they are still with people that have a political edge. Each Iraqi or group of Iraqis will have a diversity of views, which will diminish the political edge. We believe as a democracy that politicians should be the representatives of the people. If we want to democratize the world, why do we not use this same strategy? Ask the questions, ask the right people, and then make a statement.

West Bank Attack Kills Israeli Soldier

To the Editor:

It is so sad to me that during this time of war a man can be killed without so much as a thought. Mindless bombings have allowed us as human beings to become desensitized to the bloodshed, but still the article, "West Bank Attack Kills Israeli Soldier" gave me chills. The thought that this man died of wounds initiated by an unexplained stabbing is revolting. What was the objective of al-Khatib? There is mention in the article suggesting no relation between the police officer and the soldier, so what was the motive? Also, the article explained that the stabbing was "condemned" by the Palestinian Prime Minister, Salam Fayyad. What exactly does this mean? This could very well suggest that the perpetrator was sent to prison or possibly worse. It could also suggest that the Prime Minister merely dubbed the action as bad. Whatever the consequence, the action is one of malice and heartless intent, and should not be ignored. I am glad that the Prime Minister has chosen to attend to this situation, although I may not understand his direction.

Saving Marja

To the Editor:

A military operation is going to take place "soon," which involves the American and Afghan military attempting to rid Marja, Afghanistan of the Taliban. There were no specifics on how this was going to take place, but many villagers and elders in the town fear for the safety of the local people. The Taliban warned the people to stay in their houses and to leave the city; they have buried many mines in the roads and footpaths. I would like to know why there is a planned battle, when it seems that the Taliban are in a constant battle; The Taliban are not likely to surrender. Because both sides of this dilemma believe they are doing the right thing, fighting does not seem to be the best answer, but unfortunately, nobody has come up with an alternative. Many of the villagers do not believe the Taliban will leave for good, but that they will eventually come back.

Atomic Agency Views Iran’s Stepped-Up Enrichment of Uranium as a Violation

To the Editor:
Re: “Atomic Agency Views Iran’s Stepped-Up Enrichment of Uranium as a Violation” (news article Feb 12):
Iran broke its word by increasing the enrichment of it Uranium to near weapons grade. The United Nations is correct to ask them to stop their program completely as they are unwilling to abide by the rules they agreed to. The only reason I could understand for a sudden bolstering of their nuclear defensive systems would be an imminent threat that we are not aware of. Another possibly for this build-up without supervision or permission could be plans to dramatically change the power hierarchy around them. I cannot pretend to know their minds or motives, but I would imagine that they did not act in such a provocative way without thought, and we, the international we, need to know why. The Middle East is in turmoil currently and a shift in power as large as enrichment of volatile compounds, purposeful compounds, could begin to spin the chaos in new potentially bloodier directions. Iran’s nuclear programs should be halted until it is clear why they broke their word and acted so hastily.
Estelle S.
Denver, Feb 12, 2010

U.S. Envoys Head Out on a Mission to Rally Iran’s Neighbors

To the editor:

In the article, “U.S. Envoys Head Out on a Mission to Rally Iran’s Neighbors” Mark Landler discusses the Obama Administration’s strategy to seek help from other Arab countries before placing sanctions on Iran. This is the best way to try to combat Iran’s nuclear proliferation goals. Clearly, Western pressure is not persuading Iranian officials to discontinue the program, but pressure from the rest of the Arab community could hinder the Iranian plan. While I agree that this may be a very effective strategy, I am very curious about how the United States plans to allay themselves with countries that have traditionally been hostile. Clearly, a different strategy will be employed to assure the Obama administration of continued Saudi support than the support of Syria, but it will be interesting to see what promises the United States will have to make in order to win over Syria, an Iranian supporter.

"Avalanches Kill Dozens on Mountain Highway in Afghanistan"

Although the modern is in a constant state of turmoil, it seems that this week has been especially disastrous. The earthquakes last month in Haiti shook the world with its destruction. But now, the misfortunes in Afghanistan adds to the suffering of human life. Wednesday, 10 February an article announced the avalanches in the northern part of Afghanistan that occurred on Tuesday ("Avalanches Kill Dozens on Mountain Highway in Afghanistan"). Though this incident did not reach the numerous calamities as Haiti, it does not make it any less shocking. Thus, I think that instead of concentrating so hard in preparing for the attack near Marja, the U.S. forces should send aid or resources to the Hindu Kush pass. In doing so, it demonstrates that the U.S. forces are not simply fighting machines, but compassionate beings. The recovery work may be concluding by the time forces reach the area, but the philanthropic work would only have just begun. This is how the U.S. should present itself to the Afghani people; they should respond with kindness. The U.S. military actions may have created tensions in Afghanistan, but even "enemies" can show respect for the loss of human life, wherever it may be.

The Porous Pakistan Border

To the editor:

When I think about the war in Afghanistan I usually only think of the "big picture" and not so much the smaller, more unheard of aspects of it. This was until I read an article describing the difficulties we face because of the lack of security at the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. The lack of responsiveness on both sides of the border is increasing the difficulities for American troops to accomplish their goals. While American troops are attempting to stop the Taliban, members are easily crossing the border and smuggling weapons into Pakistan where American and NATO forces cannot reach them. There is security at the border, although it's anything but secure. The gaurds are being bribed and vehicles traveling across are not being searched or the passengers identified. This is just one of the many less publized difficulties for American forces. We are constantly complaining about how long this war has been going on, but we fail to realize some of the smaller issues that are prolonging it. In order to accomplish goals, these "loop-holes" in the sytem need to be fixed.

"Explosions Amid Crowds of Shiite Pilgrims in Iraq Kill at Least 27 and Wound Scores"

To The Editor,

Make this article anymore confusing. How many were actually killed and wounded? Then say that "Iraq law has also proved unhelpful in ending the dispute, as there is no proceeding for resolving who has the final say on candidate disqualifications", as if Ambassador Hill can expedite anything. Just as Americans have had problems with elections and qualifications, there is always the unthinkable to occur in such events. American haven' t had issues such as the Iraqies have had to deal with.

Bruised Maid Dies at 12, and Pakistan Seethes

It's easy to forget how blessed we are in America, with laws that protect us from things like child labor. Unfortunately, as Sabrina Tevernise points out in her article, Bruised Maid Dies at 12, and, Pakistan Seethes, this is not the case in many places, including Pakistan. The poverty there is so great that children are forced to work in order to help support their families. I cannot believe that Mrs. Tavernise stated that there are 6-year olds are even employed! And even worse, those who are too young to be protected by any sort of law are mistreated. With 40 percent of the population below the poverty line, isn't it time to do something??? The title of the article says "...Pakistan seethes." The definition of "seethe" is: "to surge or foam as if boiling, or to be in a state of agitation..."(according to dictionary.com) I would like to know what Mrs. Tavernise's definition of seething is because she quotes a gentleman saying that he has doubts that justice will prevail. I feel as if there is a general disinterest and lack of concern for the lower class in that society. Hardly seething. If Pakistan were to actually see what they are doing to their lower class and they seethed about it, do you think they would start to move to make it better???

Explosions Amid Crowds of Shiite Pilgrims in Iraq Kill at Least 27 and Wound Scores

To the Editor:

I find it very interesting than an American made newspaper would claim that "American officials and the United Nations have played a crucial role in trying to solve the complicated dispute over the candidacies." Who are we to say that our way is best? Why is it somehow sickly American to jump on to other people's soil and tell them how to run their country. In the same debate as to which god is the real one or not, each person can have their own belief system. There are pagans, Christians, Satanists, Muslims and all other sorts. Each person is allowed to believe in their own god. So why is this not the same with government? Why is the American way the only "correct" one? In many cultures, war is the best way of deciding leaders. The strong will always prevail. We cannot justify demeaning another culture because of our disagreement. The American way has worked well for some, but it will never work for all, and the more we claim to have the best way the more other countries and political nations will realize that our bold claim has little merit.

2nd Big Attack in Days on Pilgrims in Iraq

To the Editor:

Re: “2nd Big Attack in Days on Pilgrims in Iraq” (news article Feb 4):
As an American who enjoys relative safety and normality on a daily basis, I was moved by Marc Santora’s article. These Shiite pilgrims have been bombed numerous times on their journey and still the resolve to complete this quest is resolute. The story, occurring in Iraq is one that inspires questions about how can we defend people against such attacks as these. I am not speaking of Americans coming in and shielding everyone but rather something that these people can do to minimize the damage done and the death toll. It would seem in much of the Middle East the people, as we are apt to do, have simply adapted to living with such threats as part of the everyday. In light of these persistent attacks against Shiite pilgrims perhaps as a short term-goal someone should focus on how to protect local economies, properties and people. While others hassle with the long –term goal of healing, at least part, of this festering situation in the Middle East.

Estelle S.
Denver, Feb 5, 2010

To the Editor,
There was an article published in the Times on Wednesday February 3rd called Iran Sends Some Animals, and Some Ambitions into Space. The main thing that I noticed with this article was that not once did the author explain exactly what Iran claimed their spaceship was for. The only thing that the article did was imply that this spacecraft, and others that Iran has been manufacturing, are nuclear weapons in disguise. In fact Iran’s space craft was barely mentioned except to imply that the video footage that had been released was just a cover. The rest of the article was about how the U.S. keeps telling Iran to stop manufacturing nuclear weapons. I am not saying that this spacecraft was or was not a nuclear weapon, however I think that it is wrong for the author to imply that this spacecraft is any more than a space craft without presenting more facts on the subject.

Poor getting poorer and the wealthy getting by with abuse?

To the Editor,

In the article written by Sabrina Tavernise, "Bruised Maid Dies at 12, and Pakistan Seethes" published on February 6th 2010 addresses the issue of poor people in Pakistan and how a low income creates desperate workers. The article states that Shazia Masih was born into a poor family, and her wealthy employer is being accused to beating the 12 year old girl and later reporting her death. The employer claimed that she died from a skin disorder but the exams are showing 17 different places of bruising. Shazia Masih made $8 a month adding to her family's income of $62 a month, and did so by cleaning floors, toilets, and cars. Poverty is extravagant in Pakistan along with wealthy hiring them for services, exclusively children. The article does not say what religions are most impacted in the region but the article made me think about Muhammad and his hopes for an equal society.

LTE 2

To the editor:
There was an article in the February 1st edition of the NYT talks about a Pakistani Taliban leader, Hakimullah Meshud. This article discusses how Mashud is believed to be dead but there is no proof. He is the one who admitted to setting up the suicide bombing against the C.I.A. is December and it is very important that we know if he is dead or alive since this was one of the biggest attacks against the agency in over 20 years. Belief keeps increasing but we have still seen no proof of his death. By publishing this article many people will forget all about the attack because the person responsible is dead, even though we don't know for sure. By saying it is believed that he is dead it allows people to forget and move on. I feel that it would be more appropriate to word it differently, and suggest that nobody knows if he is dead or alive, but not that people believe he is dead, especially since there is no proof.

"Forces Ready to Attack Taliban in Afghan Town"

To the Editor:
Oxymoron: Military intelligence. Sometimes I wonder what goes through the minds of our military generals. I have no doubt they know more about military tactics than I do, but many times I question if they realize how unusual their decisions look to the laity. In reference to an article on 4 February 2010 (“Forces Ready to Attack Taliban in Afghan Town”), I fail to see how the tactics mentioned would greatly benefit the U.S./ISAF. The article stated that a “secret” offensive would be launched in the “near future” somewhere. Whilst the article did not mention when, it repeatedly stated a name of a town that is most likely the target city. Marja, Afghanistan has been a Taliban stronghold and is the expected location for the offensive. The tactic of telling the other side “secret” plans is nothing new, but it is extremely risky, with few historical examples of success. Because of the increased troop numbers since last December, the Taliban have become more concentrated in their efforts and when this offense occurs, there will likely be many casualties on both sides. But to what end? A retreat by a side to regroup, reorganize, and retaliate? Surrender? And what will happen after? The article mentioned that if Marja is taken by U.S. forces, the troops will stay to defend it, but it opens the door to retribution by Taliban forces. This offensive also comes at an interesting time. The U.N. was trying to get peace negotiations with the Taliban by taking some names off the terrorist “blacklist”. With this offensive, any hope for that tactic is gone, as well as any sort of peace talks. I do support the efforts to liberate the city of Marja, but I fail to see the logic in the operational tactics to achieve this objective. But even this is mere speculation. What proof is there that the U.S. forces will even succeed? I guess only time will tell what will come of this offensive and how it will affect the ongoing conflict.

Kellye T.
Greeley, Colo. 5 February 2010

Top U.S. Commander to be Trusted??

Regarding the article entitled, “Top U.S. Commander Sees Progress in Afghanistan” they quote General Stanley A. McChrystal, commander of the International Security Assistance Force and U.S. Forces Afghanistan saying, “that we will make real progress in 2010” and that, “if they want to fight, then obviously that will have to be the outcome”. What makes me nervous about this article and the quotations included in it is that there is not proposed alternative to the apparently inevitable loss of lives. If fighting will “obviously” be the outcome than the loss of lives is also obvious and it is disturbing the commanding officer of our men and women overseas is willing to admit to the American public that lives will be risked and possibly lost without any possible alternative. It seems to me that the United States military is just giving in to the insurgent forces and giving them just what they want, American lives.

The Catholic Church Steps Up

To the Editor:

In Tuesday’s paper there was an article discussing the Catholic Church’s response the purposed religious symbol ban in public schools in France. To many this ban seems to target Muslim women and their full-face coverings. The Catholic Church in France is speaking out against the ban because they are concerned that if France violates the rights of Muslim women there will not be an incentive for Islamic dominated countries to respect the rights of their Christian citizens. It is affirming to see the Catholic Church stepping in to protect the rights of the Islamic minority of France. However, I am curious to see how the French government responds to the Church’s appeal. Recently, France has tried to keep conspicuous signs religion out of the public as much as possible, so it will be interesting to see if they even listen to the Church’s request.

"Bruised Maid Dies at 12 and Pakistan Seethes"

In your February 6th article about child labor in Pakistan, the author talks about the injustice surrounding the death of a 12 year old girl at the hands of her employer, a prominent lawyer. Apparently, this is not all that uncommon in Pakistan, where the poor are often forced to allow their children to work for unfair wages in order to supplement any meager income flow of the adults in the family. If the meager income is so vital to the family's survival, than a raise of wage couldn't but help the situation. This 12 year old girl's family has received some compensation from the media, however her abuser is unlikely to receive penalty. This is a gross violation of human rights that is due to the fact that there is such a huge class difference between those being abused, and their abusers. Is this not reminisce of the child labor that took place during the Industrial Revolution of the United States? The solution then was to impose strict child labor laws. I see no reason this could not work here, especially if as the author says, the whole of Pakistan is "seething" and wants to correct this problem.

Hannah N.

Mir Hussein Moussavi Speaks Out

To the editor:

Mir Hussein Moussavi is the Iranian opposition leader that ran against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in June and is once again making remarks against Iran’s leaders. He is calling their behavior “dictatorial and terrifying.” These remarks were made when it was announced that nine imprisoned antigovernment protesters would soon be hanged. Moussavi said that he once believed, like many, that the revolution in the 1970’s had brought change, but he now says he does not believe that anymore. This situation is a representation that the Muslim community is still currently in reform. The dictatorship is not yet gone and there is violence erupting because of the harsh leadership. There is opposition and outcry from civilians for a different way of life. The revolution in 1979 clearly did not achieve its purpose and the citizens of Iran are still waiting and demanding an actual revolution. Iran needs a different and less dictatorial leader that can reform their country or there will continue to be severe violence and protest.

LTE 2: Of Fighting Fire with Baking Soda

To the Editor:

In “Even Where Pakistan Law Exists, Taliban Find a Porous Border” by Souad Mekhennet and Richard A. Oppel, Jr, the real security problems in the conflicts against Afghanistan are identified. Though there have been recent problems such as the Xmas bomber who attempted to bomb an airplane flying from the Netherlands to Detroit, Michigan, the United States has worked strenuously to heighten security. As one who lives within the American borders I am grateful. However, Americans are not attempting to heighten security where it matters. The article suggests that there has been little done to place pressure on Afghani and Pakistani officials to evaluate border commanders.

The article lists many problems without mentioning what solutions should be taken. Our own government is based on checks and balances and I feel this should be implemented in Afghanistan and Pakistan to minimize corruption, corruption that the article deciphers is part of the Afghanistan border enforcement commander Colonel Abdul Raziq’s paycheck. However, this does not mean we should implement democracy, just checks and balances. It is important to stop fighting fire with fire and instead use baking soda.